Sixty percent of executives say geopolitical risk makes them more likely to pursue sovereign technology solutions. Yet only 15% have made AI sovereignty a CEO or board-level priority. MIT Sloan's survey of nearly 2,000 executives across 28 countries reveals a dangerous gap: as nations increasingly govern AI to reflect national priorities and cultural norms, most multinationals haven't elevated sovereign AI from a compliance issue to a strategic one.
_{^{Article · 10 min}}

_{Peterson Institute}
Is this the end of America’s hegemony?
^{Analysis · 15 min}

_{Peterson Institute}
Can middle powers rescue the world trading system?
^{Analysis · 12 min}

_RAND
Pooling Europe’s compute
^{Report · 12 min}

_McKinsey
AI’s next big mission is rewiring your workplace
^{Article · 10 min}

_{Goldman Sachs}
The case for distressed debt investing in private credit
^{Podcast · 20 min}

_Forrester
Europe builds the blueprint for social platform accountability
^{Blog · 8 min}

Know someone who’d find this useful? Forward this email or share the signup link:
Register here to receive Lens Daily.

We’re inundated with “thought leadership” that’s good, bad, and indifferent.
Lens Daily brings the best of the best into focus.
Subscriptions may be required to view some content.