Are trade surpluses natural outcomes of comparative advantage — or can governments engineer them? The Peterson Institute finds that government policies explain nearly half of historical trade imbalances, and that countries can effectively buy a surplus through deliberate action. A foundational finding that reframes every tariff dispute, trade negotiation, and supply chain strategy in the current environment.
_{^{Article · 12 min}}

_{Harvard Business Review}
Why some junior employees work well with AI — and other’s don’t
^{Article · 10 min}

_{MIT Sloan Management Review}
Robots are coming — but not everywhere
^{Article · 12 min}

_{Peterson Institute}
Trump’s new tariffs over forced labor are unlikely to survive a court challenge
^{Analysis · 10 min}

_McKinsey
The human advantage in an AI economy
^{Article · 10 min}

_Gartner
Start with AI literacy: Why most leaders are missing the point
^{Podcast · 28 min}

_BCG
CEOs are starting to see value from AI. Now comes execution
^{Article · 10 min}

Know someone who’d find this useful? Forward this email or share the signup link:
Register here to receive Lens Daily.

We’re inundated with “thought leadership” that’s good, bad, and indifferent.
Lens Daily brings the best of the best into focus.
Subscriptions may be required to view some content.